This Article is Longer Than It Needs to Be

There are blockbuster trades.

There are rebuilding trades.

There are salary dumps.

There are “change-of-scenery” trades.

And then there are trades like this.

The Detroit Tigers have acquired a 1998 third-round pick from the Kansas City Royals in exchange for a 1997 fifth-round pick and a 1998 fourth-round pick.

That’s it.

That’s the trade.

No players.

No salary implications.

No franchise-altering decisions.

Just two general managers staring at a draft board and deciding they’d rather have different pieces of paper.

I’ve spent the last several minutes trying to determine who won this trade.

I have failed.

Detroit apparently decided they’d rather consolidate value into a single third-round selection next year than spread it across a fifth-rounder this year and a fourth-rounder next year.

Kansas City apparently decided they’d rather have two picks than one.

Both arguments make sense.

Neither argument is particularly exciting.

Maybe Detroit has someone targeted in next year’s draft.

Maybe Kansas City wants more lottery tickets.

Maybe both owners accidentally clicked “Accept Trade” and decided to roll with it.

Who’s to say?

The reality is that draft-pick swaps like this are almost impossible to evaluate today because the answer depends entirely on players who haven’t been selected yet.

Three years from now, one of these picks could become an All-Star and everyone will pretend they saw it coming.

Today?

We’re all guessing.

Even the people making the trade are probably guessing.

And that’s okay.

Not every transaction needs to shake the foundations of the league.

Sometimes two teams just decide they’d prefer different draft assets.

This is one of those times.

Trade Grades

Detroit Tigers: Sure

Kansas City Royals: Why Not

See everybody tomorrow when someone inevitably trades an MVP candidate for six draft picks and a backup catcher.